• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • MARKETS & PRODUCTS
    • Markets


      Construction

      Cybersecurity

      Fixed Gas & Flame Detection

      General Industry

      Healthcare

      HVAC-R

      Oil & Gas

      Training

      Utilities

      Products


      Combustion Analysis

      Confined Space

      Connected Work

      Corporate

      Fall Protection

      Fixed Gas & Flame Detection

      Gas Analysis

      General

      Head Protection

      Heat Stress

      Leak Detection

      Portable Gas Detection

      Refrigerant Analysis

      Respiratory Protection

      Column
  • SUBSCRIBE

Can a Fire and Gas System be Considered a Safety Instrumented System?

3 Min Read | May 28, 2021

Reading Time: 3 minutesThere has been much industry debate over the categorization of Fire and Gas Systems (FGS) as Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS), especially as the concept of functional safety matures in the marketplace and compliance to IEC 61508 / 61511 standards is more prevalent. Read our blog to learn more.

May 28, 2021 by Kimberly Smith

Reading Time: 3 minutes

There has been much industry debate over the categorization of Fire and Gas Systems (FGS) as Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS), especially as the concept of functional safety matures in the marketplace and compliance to IEC 61508 / 61511 standards is more prevalent. Fire and gas detection products and technologies are fundamentally different from other forms of instrumentation in a plant. Detector placement and environmental conditions can affect whether the instrument detects a gas leak or flame, even when the detector is functioning properly. Incorrect detector placement and poor environmental conditions can prevent the product from detecting a hazardous gas leak or flame, even when the unit is functioning properly.  When a safety hazard is undetected, then the appropriate safety action (shut down, deluge, venting, etc.) cannot be initiated. Because of this, many end-users and system integrators are wondering if the functional safety standards are applicable to a FGS.

A legitimate argument can be made both for and against the classification of a FGS as a SIS. Those that oppose the concept typically believe that because of the inherent limitations of fire and gas detection equipment, a FGS should only augment a plant safety system and not be considered a critical safety function.  If a properly functioning FGS comprises a SIL 2 logic solver, a SIL 2 sensor, and a SIL 2 final element, but does not see the hazardous gas or flame or mitigate the hazard, then the SIL 2 risk reduction factor of 100 has not been achieved. For this reason, many people think that too much emphasis and importance is placed on the hardware of the system which can instill a false sense of security. To eliminate this false sense of security, many industry experts feel that a FGS should not comply to the IEC 61508 / 61511 standards. Rather a new performance standard should be developed specifically for FGS and adequately address the issue of detector placement, coverage, and related issues.

The advocates for classifying a FGS as a SIS claim that a system of gas and flame detectors is an effective mitigation layer of protection and should fall within the scope of IEC 61508 / 61511. From MSA’s perspective, if a facility chooses to implement a FGS as a layer of protection while understanding the inherent limitations of the technology, then the system should conform to the guidelines put forth in both 61508 and 61511. A FGS that automatically initiates process actions to help prevent or mitigate a hazardous event can be considered a Safety Instrumented Function (SIF) or SIS. The FGS would need to be composed of appropriate logic solver(s), sensor(s), and final element(s),

However, if there is incorrect placement of the gas or flame detectors and hazardous gases and flames are not adequately detected, then the SIF / SIS will not be effective, regardless of the SIL level of the system. Correct sensor placement is more important than deciding whether a FGS should be SIL 2 or SIL 3.  The bottom line is there is no universal, ‘cookie cutter’ solution to safety. The FGS system must be designed based on the unique requirements of each plant and application. Just purchasing a SIL 2 logic solver, a SIL 2 sensor, and SIL 2 final element, does not guarantee a SIL 2 system.

Fire and Gas Systems can mitigate a hazardous event. Risk reduction targets can be established and a FGS can effectively achieve those targets. Fire and gas detection manufacturers are designing their products and processes to comply with IEC 61508 standards. Systems integrators and end-users are designing fire and gas systems by conforming to IEC 61511 standards. Ultimately, the heart of functional safety is preventing and mitigating risk through the safety lifecycle. Fire & Gas Systems can be a critical and successful layer of protection that reduces risk. Therefore, when applied appropriately and with the knowledge of the limitation of the technology, a FGS can successfully be considered a SIS.

Questions about SIL? View the full on-demand webinar, SIL Simplified: Best practices in executing a SIL compliant Fire and Gas System.

Recommended for You

Fixed Gas & Flame Detection

UV/IR vs MSIR Flame Technology

September 9, 2024
2 Min Read
Senscient ELDS
Fixed Gas & Flame Detection

Ethylene Gas Leak Detection

August 9, 2024
2 Min Read
Anhydrous Ammonia Tank
Fixed Gas & Flame Detection

Are You Prepared for Ammonia Gas Leaks

January 22, 2024
5 Min Read
Fixed Gas & Flame Detection

In the Know: Navigating the Hazards of Methane Gas Leaks

February 12, 2024
4 Min Read
Share:

Footer

MSA MISSION: That men and women may work in safety and that they, their families, and their communities may live in health throughout the world.

MSASafety.com

  • Construction
  • General Industry
  • Oil & Gas
  • HVAC-R
  • Utilities
  • Fixed Gas & Flame Detection
  • Fire Service
MSA on Facebook   MSA on X   MSA on Instagram   MSA on LinkedIn   MSA on YouTube  

Contact

  • blog@msasafety.com
  • 1-800-672-2222
  • View All Contact Info
  • Subscribe

Other MSA Blogs

  • Fire Service – The Scene
  • FieldServer – The Safety Connection

© 2024 MSA. All rights reserved.

© 2025 MSA . All rights reserved.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT